3  coxph versus svycoxph

Comparison of coxph versus svycoxph after multiple imputation and propensity score matching

This is a reproducible example on how to use coxph and svycoxph in combination with multiple imputation and propensity score matching using a mimids object from the MatchThem package.

Load packages:

library(dplyr)
library(survival)
library(mice)
library(MatchThem)
library(survey)
library(here)
library(gtsummary)
library(parallelly)
library(ranger)
library(furrr)

source(here("functions", "source_encore.io_functions.R"))

# track time
runtime <- tictoc::tic()

3.1 Data generation

We use the simulate_flaura() function to simulate a realistic oncology comparative effectiveness cohort analytic dataset.

# load example dataset with missing observations
data_miss <- simulate_flaura(
  n_total = 3500, 
  treat_prevalence = .51, 
  seed = 42, 
  include_id = FALSE, 
  imposeNA = TRUE
  )

covariates <- data_miss |> 
  select(starts_with("c_"), starts_with("dem_")) |> 
  colnames()

data_miss |> 
  tbl_summary(
    by = "treat", 
    include = covariates
    )

Characteristic	0 N = 1,712 1	1 N = 1,788 1
c_smoking_history	579 (51%)	520 (43%)
Unknown	578	584
c_number_met_sites
1	837 (74%)	899 (75%)
2	249 (22%)	255 (21%)
3	41 (3.6%)	42 (3.5%)
4	7 (0.6%)	8 (0.7%)
Unknown	578	584
c_ecog_cont	714 (63%)	637 (53%)
Unknown	578	584
c_stage_initial_dx_cont
1	101 (8.9%)	0 (0%)
2	17 (1.5%)	12 (1.0%)
3	15 (1.3%)	38 (3.2%)
4	1,001 (88%)	1,154 (96%)
Unknown	578	584
c_hemoglobin_g_dl_cont	12.97 (12.16, 13.72)	12.89 (11.98, 13.75)
Unknown	578	584
c_urea_nitrogen_mg_dl_cont	2.76 (2.42, 3.08)	2.77 (2.58, 2.97)
Unknown	578	584
c_platelets_10_9_l_cont	255 (218, 290)	266 (230, 302)
Unknown	578	584
c_calcium_mg_dl_cont	2.23 (2.21, 2.25)	2.24 (2.21, 2.27)
Unknown	578	584
c_glucose_mg_dl_cont	4.64 (4.55, 4.72)	4.65 (4.58, 4.73)
Unknown	578	584
c_lymphocyte_leukocyte_ratio_cont	2.94 (2.81, 3.08)	2.93 (2.82, 3.04)
Unknown	578	584
c_alp_u_l_cont	4.47 (4.33, 4.61)	4.51 (4.42, 4.59)
Unknown	578	584
c_protein_g_l_cont	67.8 (65.1, 70.6)	69.0 (66.0, 72.1)
Unknown	578	584
c_alt_u_l_cont	2.93 (2.72, 3.14)	2.86 (2.64, 3.10)
Unknown	578	584
c_albumin_g_l_cont	39.01 (36.94, 41.01)	39.98 (37.76, 42.07)
Unknown	578	584
c_bilirubin_mg_dl_cont	-0.71 (-1.45, 0.07)	-0.85 (-1.74, -0.03)
Unknown	578	584
c_chloride_mmol_l_cont	102.08 (100.08, 104.20)	102.05 (100.20, 104.12)
Unknown	578	584
c_monocytes_10_9_l_cont	-0.53 (-0.78, -0.24)	-0.51 (-0.68, -0.35)
Unknown	578	584
c_eosinophils_leukocytes_ratio_cont	0.72 (0.50, 0.97)	0.69 (0.28, 1.07)
Unknown	578	584
c_ldh_u_l_cont	1.68 (1.65, 1.71)	1.69 (1.65, 1.72)
Unknown	578	584
c_hr_cont	4.41 (4.39, 4.43)	4.43 (4.40, 4.46)
Unknown	578	584
c_sbp_cont	4.85 (4.77, 4.92)	4.85 (4.79, 4.92)
Unknown	578	584
c_oxygen_cont	97.000 (96.986, 97.014)	97.001 (96.993, 97.007)
Unknown	578	584
c_neutrophil_lymphocyte_ratio_cont	1.33 (1.11, 1.56)	1.28 (1.02, 1.52)
Unknown	578	584
c_bmi_cont	3.23 (3.14, 3.31)	3.23 (3.14, 3.31)
Unknown	578	584
c_ast_alt_ratio_cont	0.09 (-0.10, 0.30)	0.12 (-0.07, 0.32)
Unknown	578	584
c_time_dx_to_index	73 (43, 103)	43 (32, 55)
Unknown	578	584
c_de_novo_mets_dx	774 (68%)	945 (78%)
Unknown	578	584
c_height_cont	1.64 (1.59, 1.69)	1.65 (1.59, 1.70)
Unknown	578	584
c_weight_cont	68 (60, 76)	69 (61, 76)
Unknown	578	584
c_dbp_cont	75 (70, 79)	76 (72, 80)
Unknown	578	584
c_year_index
<2018	87 (5.1%)	1,703 (95%)
2018+	1,625 (95%)	85 (4.8%)
dem_age_index_cont	70 (63, 76)	69 (64, 74)
dem_sex_cont	614 (36%)	569 (32%)
dem_race	664 (59%)	753 (63%)
Unknown	578	584
dem_region
Midwest	123 (11%)	137 (11%)
Northeast	382 (34%)	390 (32%)
South	409 (36%)	456 (38%)
West	220 (19%)	221 (18%)
Unknown	578	584
dem_ses
1	102 (9.0%)	217 (18%)
2	152 (13%)	157 (13%)
3	302 (27%)	210 (17%)
4	271 (24%)	291 (24%)
5	307 (27%)	329 (27%)
Unknown	578	584
1 n (%); Median (Q1, Q3)

3.2 Multiple imputation

Multiple imputation using mice:

# impute data
data_imp <- futuremice(
  parallelseed = 42,
  n.core = parallel::detectCores()-1,
  data = data_miss,
  method = "rf",
  m = 10,
  print = FALSE
  )

3.3 Propensity score matching and weighting

Apply propensity score matching and weighting with replacement within in each imputed dataset:

# apply propensity score matching on mids object
ps_form <- as.formula(paste("treat ~", paste(covariates, collapse = " + ")))

# matching
data_mimids <- matchthem(
  formula = ps_form,
  datasets = data_imp,
  approach = 'within',
  method = 'nearest',
  caliper = 0.01,
  ratio = 1,
  replace = F
  )

# SMR weighting
data_wimids <- weightthem(
  formula = ps_form,
  datasets = data_imp,
  approach = 'within',
  method = "glm",
  estimand = "ATT"
  )

# trim extreme weights
data_wimids <- trim(
  x = data_wimids, 
  at = .95, 
  lower = TRUE
  )

3.4 Outcome model comparisons

Next, we compare the marginal treatment effect estimates coming from a Cox proportional hazards model after propensity score matching and weighting as implemented in the coxph() and in the svycoxph() functions.

From the MatchThem documentation:

Important

• with() applies the supplied model in expr to the (matched or weighted) multiply imputed datasets, automatically incorporating the (matching) weights when possible. The argument to expr should be of the form glm(y ~ z, family = quasibinomial), for example, excluding the data or weights argument, which are automatically supplied.

• Functions from the survey package, such as svyglm(), are treated a bit differently. No svydesign object needs to be supplied because with() automatically constructs and supplies it with the imputed dataset and estimated weights. When cluster = TRUE (or with() detects that pairs should be clustered; see the cluster argument above), pair membership is supplied to the ids argument of svydesign().

• After weighting using weightthem(), glm_weightit() should be used as the modeling function to fit generalized linear models. It correctly produces robust standard errors that account for estimation of the weights, if possible. See WeightIt::glm_weightit() for details. Otherwise, svyglm() should be used rather than glm() in order to correctly compute standard errors.

• For Cox models, coxph() will produce approximately correct standard errors when used with weighting, but svycoxph() will produce more accurate standard errors when matching is used.

Matching

We now want to compare treatment effect estimates for treat when computed (a) using coxph (survival package) and (b) svycoxph (survey package). More information on estimating treatment effects after matching is provided in https://kosukeimai.github.io/MatchIt/articles/estimating-effects.html#survival-outcomes

3.4.0.1 coxph

# coxph result
coxph_results <- with(
  data = data_mimids,
  expr = coxph(formula = Surv(fu_itt_months, death_itt) ~ treat, 
               weights = weights, 
               cluster = subclass,
               robust = TRUE
               )
  ) |> 
  pool() |> 
  tidy(exponentiate = TRUE, conf.int = TRUE) |> 
  mutate(package = "survival") |> 
  select(package, term, estimate, std.error, conf.low, conf.high) 

coxph_results

3.4.0.2 svycoxph

# svycoxph result
svycoxph_results <- with(
  data = data_mimids,
  expr = svycoxph(formula = Surv(fu_itt_months, death_itt) ~ treat),
  cluster = TRUE
  ) |> 
  pool() |> 
  tidy(exponentiate = TRUE, conf.int = TRUE) |> 
  mutate(package = "survey") |> 
  select(package, term, estimate, std.error, conf.low, conf.high)

svycoxph_results

3.4.0.3 Summary

rbind(coxph_results, svycoxph_results)

   package  term  estimate std.error  conf.low conf.high
1 survival treat 0.6809175 0.1662638 0.4841641 0.9576269
2   survey treat 0.6809175 0.1665147 0.4853937 0.9552010

Weighting

3.4.0.4 coxph

# coxph result
coxph_results <- with(
  data = data_wimids,
  expr = coxph(formula = Surv(fu_itt_months, death_itt) ~ treat,
               weights = weights, 
               robust = TRUE
               )
  ) |> 
  pool() |> 
  tidy(exponentiate = TRUE, conf.int = TRUE) |> 
  mutate(package = "survival") |> 
  select(package, term, estimate, std.error, conf.low, conf.high) 

coxph_results

3.4.0.5 svycoxph

# svycoxph result
svycoxph_results <- with(
  data = data_wimids,
  expr = svycoxph(formula = Surv(fu_itt_months, death_itt) ~ treat),
  cluster = TRUE
  ) |> 
  pool() |> 
  tidy(exponentiate = TRUE, conf.int = TRUE) |> 
  mutate(package = "survey") |> 
  select(package, term, estimate, std.error, conf.low, conf.high) 

svycoxph_results

3.4.0.6 Summary

rbind(coxph_results, svycoxph_results)

   package  term  estimate  std.error  conf.low conf.high
1 survival treat 0.7646088 0.07472081 0.6598544 0.8859933
2   survey treat 0.7646088 0.07472930 0.6598863 0.8859505

3.5 Session info

Script runtime: 0.97 minutes.

Loaded packages

pander::pander(subset(data.frame(sessioninfo::package_info()), attached==TRUE, c(package, loadedversion)))

	package	loadedversion
dplyr	dplyr	1.1.4
furrr	furrr	0.3.1
future	future	1.34.0
gtsummary	gtsummary	2.0.1
here	here	1.0.1
MatchThem	MatchThem	1.2.1
Matrix	Matrix	1.7-0
mice	mice	3.16.0
parallelly	parallelly	1.38.0
ranger	ranger	0.16.0
survey	survey	4.4-2
survival	survival	3.5-8

Session info

pander::pander(sessionInfo())

R version 4.4.0 (2024-04-24)

Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

locale: LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8, LC_NUMERIC=C, LC_TIME=C.UTF-8, LC_COLLATE=C.UTF-8, LC_MONETARY=C.UTF-8, LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8, LC_PAPER=C.UTF-8, LC_NAME=C, LC_ADDRESS=C, LC_TELEPHONE=C, LC_MEASUREMENT=C.UTF-8 and LC_IDENTIFICATION=C

attached base packages: grid, stats, graphics, grDevices, datasets, utils, methods and base

other attached packages: furrr(v.0.3.1), future(v.1.34.0), ranger(v.0.16.0), parallelly(v.1.38.0), gtsummary(v.2.0.1), here(v.1.0.1), survey(v.4.4-2), Matrix(v.1.7-0), MatchThem(v.1.2.1), mice(v.3.16.0), survival(v.3.5-8) and dplyr(v.1.1.4)

loaded via a namespace (and not attached): tidyselect(v.1.2.1), fastmap(v.1.2.0), digest(v.0.6.37), rpart(v.4.1.23), lifecycle(v.1.0.4), magrittr(v.2.0.3), compiler(v.4.4.0), rlang(v.1.1.4), sass(v.0.4.9), tools(v.4.4.0), utf8(v.1.2.4), yaml(v.2.3.10), gt(v.0.11.0), knitr(v.1.48), htmlwidgets(v.1.6.4), xml2(v.1.3.6), withr(v.3.0.1), purrr(v.1.0.2), nnet(v.7.3-19), fansi(v.1.0.6), jomo(v.2.7-6), colorspace(v.2.1-1), ggplot2(v.3.5.1), globals(v.0.16.3), scales(v.1.3.0), iterators(v.1.0.14), MASS(v.7.3-60.2), cli(v.3.6.3), rmarkdown(v.2.28), crayon(v.1.5.3), generics(v.0.1.3), sessioninfo(v.1.2.2), commonmark(v.1.9.1), minqa(v.1.2.8), DBI(v.1.2.3), pander(v.0.6.5), stringr(v.1.5.1), splines(v.4.4.0), assertthat(v.0.2.1), parallel(v.4.4.0), base64enc(v.0.1-3), mitools(v.2.4), vctrs(v.0.6.5), WeightIt(v.1.3.0), boot(v.1.3-30), glmnet(v.4.1-8), jsonlite(v.1.8.8), mitml(v.0.4-5), listenv(v.0.9.1), foreach(v.1.5.2), tidyr(v.1.3.1), glue(v.1.7.0), nloptr(v.2.1.1), pan(v.1.9), chk(v.0.9.2), codetools(v.0.2-20), stringi(v.1.8.4), shape(v.1.4.6.1), gtable(v.0.3.5), lme4(v.1.1-35.5), munsell(v.0.5.1), tibble(v.3.2.1), pillar(v.1.9.0), htmltools(v.0.5.8.1), R6(v.2.5.1), rprojroot(v.2.0.4), evaluate(v.0.24.0), lattice(v.0.22-6), markdown(v.1.13), backports(v.1.5.0), cards(v.0.2.1), tictoc(v.1.2.1), MatchIt(v.4.5.5), broom(v.1.0.6), renv(v.1.0.7), simsurv(v.1.0.0), Rcpp(v.1.0.13), nlme(v.3.1-164), xfun(v.0.47) and pkgconfig(v.2.0.3)

Repositories

pander::pander(options('repos'))

• repos:

  REPO_NAME
  https://packagemanager.posit.co/cran/linux/noble/latest

3.6